Defendant cleared in deadly crash near rest stop

Posted by HLL Admin

A federal jury sided with a trucking company following a fatal crash near the on-ramp of an awkwardly placed rest stop on Interstate 44.

The suit stemmed from the death of 22-year-old Brandan Sutherland, who was a passenger in a 2009 Ford Focus traveling eastbound through Missouri on the evening Jan. 31, 2016. The car struck the back of a slow-moving tractor-trailer. Sutherland and the driver, William Weekley, 19, died after suffering catastrophic injuries.

Sutherland’s parents, Tabitha Holt and Clyde Sutherland, claimed that Qualified Trucking Service Inc. was liable for its driver’s allegedly negligent operation of the truck. The driver had gone to a rest stop near St. Clair, which sits in the I-44 median. Getting back onto the highway required him to merge from the left.

Steven Hughes of Hughes Lawyers, an attorney for Qualified Trucking, said the ramp runs uphill, making it especially difficult for trucks to get up to speed before entering the highway’s fast lane. He also said the driver had to come to a complete stop on the ramp due to oncoming traffic.

“That’s a bad scenario down there, where you are merging with a full load into the fast lane, whether you’re a car or a truck,” Hughes said. “I think it’s something the highway department should have been aware of a long time ago.”

He said the driver testified that his flashers were activated and that he was fully within the right lane when the accident occurred.

Hughes said the plaintiffs made a time-limited demand for the company’s $1 million policy limit, then sought $3.75 million after the demand expired, which, had the defense lost at trial, could have exposed its insurer to a claim of having acted in bad faith by refusing to settle. 

However, J.J. Burns of Dollar, Burns, Becker & Hershewe, an attorney for Sutherland’s mother, said he thought the bad-faith claim would have been difficult to achieve, as California-based Qualified Trucking was administratively dissolved following the accident. He said he asked the defense for approximately $700,000 to $800,000, but no agreement was reached.

The plaintiffs asked for $5 million to $10 million at the conclusion of the four-day trial. Burns said his client did not appeal the verdict. Sutherland’s father, who represented himself at trial, filed an appeal in the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which remains pending.

Burns said Qualified Trucking had numerous safety issues and that the driver, who had just completed trucking school and primarily spoke Mandarin, was poorly trained. However, he said, the jury apparently didn’t accept the plaintiff’s argument that the truck should have stayed on the shoulder until it reached the minimum highway speed. 

“I think [the defense] did a fantastic job of appealing to common sense in response to our arguments about the particular duties of a tractor-trailer driver under this set of circumstances,” Burns said. “Obviously, it echoed with the fact-finders.”

Update on Noncompete Agreements:...

Noncompete agreements and their implementation have long been a source of argument and rulemaking in employment law. On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) made a significant decision. It voted 3-2 to issue its final rule banning employers from imposing noncompete clauses on their workers. This decision came after more than 15 months

Read more…

West Virginia Law Aims...

A new trucking liability law has arrived. West Virginia’s recent enactment of legislation imposing a cap on noneconomic damage awards in civil lawsuits involving commercial motor vehicles has stirred considerable discussion within the trucking industry. As legal advisors specializing in transportation law, Hughes Lawyers, LLC, recognizes the significance of this development and the implications it

Read more…

Civil Rights Update: Supreme...

The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled on a longstanding issue regarding the harm necessary for an employment discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. In Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, the Court determined that a plaintiff need only demonstrate “some” harm, rather than “significant” harm, from an employment decision to prove

Read more…

Contact Us

    The content of this website is presented for general informational purposes only. Every effort has been made to ensure the website's accuracy however there is no guarantee that the content provided herein is correct, complete, and up-to-date.

    This website is not intended to be a source of legal advice nor should it be considered as legal advice. The reader should not rely on the information presented on this website and should always seek the advice of competent counsel licensed to practice in the state in which the reader resides. Transmission of information on this website does not create an attorney-client relationship with Hughes Lawyers, LLC or with Steven Hughes and Joseph Hoffman individually. The firm assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the information contained on the website, nor does it offer a warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

    The use of email, including the contact form on this website, for confidential or sensitive information is discouraged. If the reader chooses to send an email with confidential or sensitive information, reader accepts the risks of lack of confidentiality.

    The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

    © 2021 Hughes Lawyers, LLC | All Rights Reserved