Posted by
The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled on a longstanding issue regarding the harm necessary for an employment discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. In Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, the Court determined that a plaintiff need only demonstrate “some” harm, rather than “significant” harm, from an employment decision to prove
Posted by
In June 2023, the Supreme Court delivered a landmark decision in Groff v. DeJoy, a case that significantly shapes the landscape of religious accommodations in the workplace. The unanimous ruling underscored the rights of employees seeking religious accommodations. It particularly focused on a Christian mail carrier’s right to decline work on Sundays. While the Court
Posted by
In a groundbreaking decision that has sent shockwaves through the employment law landscape, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has expanded the scope of discrimination claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. For decades, the Fifth Circuit held that an employee alleging discrimination had to prove that the adverse employment action they suffered
The content of this website is presented for general informational purposes only. Every effort has been made to ensure the website's accuracy however there is no guarantee that the content provided herein is correct, complete, and up-to-date.
This website is not intended to be a source of legal advice nor should it be considered as legal advice. The reader should not rely on the information presented on this website and should always seek the advice of competent counsel licensed to practice in the state in which the reader resides. Transmission of information on this website does not create an attorney-client relationship with Hughes Lawyers, LLC or with Steven Hughes and Joseph Hoffman individually. The firm assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the information contained on the website, nor does it offer a warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.
The use of email, including the contact form on this website, for confidential or sensitive information is discouraged. If the reader chooses to send an email with confidential or sensitive information, reader accepts the risks of lack of confidentiality.
The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
© 2021 Hughes Lawyers, LLC | All Rights Reserved