Transportation Law: Bills in Wisconsin and Indiana to Curb Lawsuit Abuse

Posted by HLL Admin

In a move to address lawsuit abuse impacting the trucking industry, Wisconsin and Indiana have recently passed legislation aimed at curbing excessive damages and promoting safety on the roads. These measures arrive against a backdrop of escalating nuclear verdicts in civil litigation. State legislators to take action to protect trucking companies and ensure fairness in legal proceedings.

Legislators Take Steps in Wisconsin and Indiana

In Wisconsin, Senate Bill 613, passed on Feb. 21, seeks to limit noneconomic damages to $1 million in court claims involving injury, death, or other losses resulting from acts or omissions by employees of commercial motor vehicle carriers. This transportation law is a response to the growing concern over rampant lawsuit abuse hindering the operations of the trucking industry. Proponents of the bill highlight the critical role of the trucking industry in the state’s economy. Industry experts emphasize the need to combat frivolous lawsuits to maintain fairness in civil litigation.

Silhouette of a commercial truck driving on a highway at sunset.

In Indiana, House Bill 1090 is awaiting the governor’s signature. It proposes amendments to transportation laws to allow evidence of non-compliance with passenger restraint system laws to be admitted in civil suits. This measure aims to mitigate damages for personal injuries or death experienced by plaintiffs involved in motor vehicle incidents. The bill’s authors and supporters point to the vital role of the trucking industry in delivering essential goods safely and efficiently and call for swift enactment of the bill to address growing obstacles posed by lawsuit abuse.

Read statements from industry stakeholders and more context from Transport Topics: State Truckers Urge Governors to Enact Legislation

Industry Support and Advocacy

State and national trucking industry stakeholders have applauded both bills and urged Govs. Tony Evers of Wisconsin and Eric Holcomb of Indiana to sign the bills into law. Advocates argue that these legislative reforms are essential to deterring frivolous lawsuits and maintaining fairness in civil litigation. Others emphasized the broader implications of these legislative reforms, noting that they contribute to justice, fairness, and safety on the roads. These measures highlight the risk of nuclear verdicts and settlements for trucking companies. These trucking companies are significant providers of middle-class jobs and vital to their respective economies.

Transportation Law: Seek Expert Legal Guidance

As these legislative changes unfold, it’s crucial for trucking companies to stay informed. Seek expert legal guidance to navigate the evolving legal landscape. At Hughes Lawyers, LLC, we specialize in transportation law. We are committed to helping our clients understand and comply with these new regulations. Contact us today. Learn more about how we can support your legal needs and ensure your continued success in the industry.

Update on Noncompete Agreements:...

Noncompete agreements and their implementation have long been a source of argument and rulemaking in employment law. On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) made a significant decision. It voted 3-2 to issue its final rule banning employers from imposing noncompete clauses on their workers. This decision came after more than 15 months

Read more…

West Virginia Law Aims...

A new trucking liability law has arrived. West Virginia’s recent enactment of legislation imposing a cap on noneconomic damage awards in civil lawsuits involving commercial motor vehicles has stirred considerable discussion within the trucking industry. As legal advisors specializing in transportation law, Hughes Lawyers, LLC, recognizes the significance of this development and the implications it

Read more…

Civil Rights Update: Supreme...

The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled on a longstanding issue regarding the harm necessary for an employment discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. In Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, the Court determined that a plaintiff need only demonstrate “some” harm, rather than “significant” harm, from an employment decision to prove

Read more…

Contact Us






    The content of this website is presented for general informational purposes only. Every effort has been made to ensure the website's accuracy however there is no guarantee that the content provided herein is correct, complete, and up-to-date.

    This website is not intended to be a source of legal advice nor should it be considered as legal advice. The reader should not rely on the information presented on this website and should always seek the advice of competent counsel licensed to practice in the state in which the reader resides. Transmission of information on this website does not create an attorney-client relationship with Hughes Lawyers, LLC or with Steven Hughes and Joseph Hoffman individually. The firm assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the information contained on the website, nor does it offer a warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

    The use of email, including the contact form on this website, for confidential or sensitive information is discouraged. If the reader chooses to send an email with confidential or sensitive information, reader accepts the risks of lack of confidentiality.

    The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

    © 2021 Hughes Lawyers, LLC | All Rights Reserved